<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Robotic Revolutions</title>
	<link>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the Past, Present and Future of Robotics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Consumer Robots Just Fancy Toys? by Stephen Forbes-Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=69#comment-52</link>
		<author>Stephen Forbes-Wilson</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=69#comment-52</guid>
					<description>Hi, I am a proud owner of a &lt;a href="http://danatecrobotics.com/index_files/L200e.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ambrogio L200 Evolution&lt;/a&gt; robotic mower, and i also have a Robosapien. And i would like to say that the Evolution is great because it does a job for me so that now i have more free time. whereas the Robosapien is just a toy, it doesn't do anything usefull except use up my free time. i believe the future of robotics is in working robot industry, robots that make our lives easier. Because they have a usefullness and a purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I am a proud owner of a <a href="http://danatecrobotics.com/index_files/L200e.htm" rel="nofollow">Ambrogio L200 Evolution</a> robotic mower, and i also have a Robosapien. And i would like to say that the Evolution is great because it does a job for me so that now i have more free time. whereas the Robosapien is just a toy, it doesn&#8217;t do anything usefull except use up my free time. i believe the future of robotics is in working robot industry, robots that make our lives easier. Because they have a usefullness and a purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Consumer Robots Just Fancy Toys? by TroyTurner</title>
		<link>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=69#comment-21</link>
		<author>TroyTurner</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=69#comment-21</guid>
					<description>At this point in the evolution of robotics, consumer robotics are in fact (somtetimes) expensive toys.  But what's happening is far more then mere entertainment.

The more of these "toys" consumers see in the marketplace, the more they become accustomed to the idea of robotics in the home, (which is not an altogether comfortable thing for many people.)  However, when the level of comfort reaches a certain threshold for the "everyman" consumer, AND a "killer App" which includes robotics hits the market, I think we'll see consumer robotics move into the mainstream, with increasing numbers of robotics uses being adopted and accepted into the American home.

There's one thing that most robotics companies currently looking at the consumer market don't seem to "get" yet:  Widespread acceptance of consumer robotics will NOT hinge upon a "killer App" ROBOT, but will instead hinge upon fulfilling a widespread consumer need with an appliance or piece of equipment that INCORPORATES robotics.  So it's not about ROBOTICS, it's about answering a need or want, and using robotics as merely part of that solution set.  If the item is a "Robotic Widget", then it will not sell as well as a "Widget" which just happens to do what its new owner needs done with a degree of autonomous-ness, robot-ness, etc.

iRobot is breaking a lot of consumer ground with the Roomba and related products, but this is primarily consumer "robot acceptance" ground.  I don't think we've seen the real "Killer App" that is going to open the floodgates of consumer robotics yet, and I don't think we'll see it in the short term with robotic lawnmowers, etc.  

But it's coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point in the evolution of robotics, consumer robotics are in fact (somtetimes) expensive toys.  But what&#8217;s happening is far more then mere entertainment.</p>
<p>The more of these &#8220;toys&#8221; consumers see in the marketplace, the more they become accustomed to the idea of robotics in the home, (which is not an altogether comfortable thing for many people.)  However, when the level of comfort reaches a certain threshold for the &#8220;everyman&#8221; consumer, AND a &#8220;killer App&#8221; which includes robotics hits the market, I think we&#8217;ll see consumer robotics move into the mainstream, with increasing numbers of robotics uses being adopted and accepted into the American home.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s one thing that most robotics companies currently looking at the consumer market don&#8217;t seem to &#8220;get&#8221; yet:  Widespread acceptance of consumer robotics will NOT hinge upon a &#8220;killer App&#8221; ROBOT, but will instead hinge upon fulfilling a widespread consumer need with an appliance or piece of equipment that INCORPORATES robotics.  So it&#8217;s not about ROBOTICS, it&#8217;s about answering a need or want, and using robotics as merely part of that solution set.  If the item is a &#8220;Robotic Widget&#8221;, then it will not sell as well as a &#8220;Widget&#8221; which just happens to do what its new owner needs done with a degree of autonomous-ness, robot-ness, etc.</p>
<p>iRobot is breaking a lot of consumer ground with the Roomba and related products, but this is primarily consumer &#8220;robot acceptance&#8221; ground.  I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ve seen the real &#8220;Killer App&#8221; that is going to open the floodgates of consumer robotics yet, and I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll see it in the short term with robotic lawnmowers, etc.  </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Developing Military Robots with Weapons by MJK</title>
		<link>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=41#comment-20</link>
		<author>MJK</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=41#comment-20</guid>
					<description>So far, they are tools. It's no different than using tanks, Alfonz.

Anyways, they already have autonomous machine-gun robots, made by &lt;a href="http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/samsung_develops_machine_gun_sentry_robot_costs_200k.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;Samsung&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, they are tools. It&#8217;s no different than using tanks, Alfonz.</p>
<p>Anyways, they already have autonomous machine-gun robots, made by <a href="http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/samsung_develops_machine_gun_sentry_robot_costs_200k.php" rel="nofollow">Samsung</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scooba Dooba Doo, Where Are You? by robotics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Scooba Dooba Doo, Where Are You?</title>
		<link>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=66#comment-19</link>
		<author>robotics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Scooba Dooba Doo, Where Are You?</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=66#comment-19</guid>
					<description>[...] &#8230;more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8230;more [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Heaven, Hell or Prevail? Joel Garreau&#8217;s &#8220;Radical Evolution&#8221; by Doctor Robot</title>
		<link>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=58#comment-18</link>
		<author>Doctor Robot</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=58#comment-18</guid>
					<description>Hey, I am an EMT PARAMEDIC.  not just an EMT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I am an EMT PARAMEDIC.  not just an EMT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Developing Military Robots with Weapons by Alfonz</title>
		<link>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=41#comment-13</link>
		<author>Alfonz</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=41#comment-13</guid>
					<description>Oh please. This is obscene. What happens when they are used to invade a country that hasn't attacked you, but has lots of oil?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh please. This is obscene. What happens when they are used to invade a country that hasn&#8217;t attacked you, but has lots of oil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Asimov&#8217;s Favorite Story: &#8220;The Last Question&#8221; by Tokay</title>
		<link>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=24#comment-11</link>
		<author>Tokay</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 03:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=24#comment-11</guid>
					<description>Wow, guys....
Just wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, guys&#8230;.<br />
Just wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Asimov&#8217;s Favorite Story: &#8220;The Last Question&#8221; by The Mole</title>
		<link>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=24#comment-10</link>
		<author>The Mole</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 20:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=24#comment-10</guid>
					<description>Richard you are a twat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard you are a twat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Robotic Eye in the Sky: United States and Britain Consider Unmanned Drones to Police Airspace by Rob Blasi</title>
		<link>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=29#comment-9</link>
		<author>Rob Blasi</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 21:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=29#comment-9</guid>
					<description>And the Hicam Microdrone has a nightvision camera!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the Hicam Microdrone has a nightvision camera!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Asimov&#8217;s Favorite Story: &#8220;The Last Question&#8221; by Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=24#comment-8</link>
		<author>Richard</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 03:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roboticrevolutions.com/?p=24#comment-8</guid>
					<description>I concur with Buff. This story sucks. I've read many of Asimov's novels before I knew what great authors were, and looking back on them every single one was crap. Asimov earns 0 out of 5 for charactization, 1 out of 5 for ideas, and only a 3 (at best) out of 5 for his plots (this story gets a 1). In other words, *sometimes* he rises to mediocrity but usually he is execrable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with Buff. This story sucks. I&#8217;ve read many of Asimov&#8217;s novels before I knew what great authors were, and looking back on them every single one was crap. Asimov earns 0 out of 5 for charactization, 1 out of 5 for ideas, and only a 3 (at best) out of 5 for his plots (this story gets a 1). In other words, *sometimes* he rises to mediocrity but usually he is execrable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
